CONFEDERATION SOUGHT THE INTERVENTION OF COMRADE BASUDEV ACHARYA M.P TO OPPOSE GOVERNMENT MOVE TO REJECT ARBITRATION AWARDS IN PARLIAMENT
GOVERNMENT IS MOVING AHEAD TO REJECT SOME ARBITRATION AWARDS
BY TAKING THEM TO PARLIAMENT IN THE SHAPE OF RESOLUTIONS
ARBITRATION AWARDS ON TRANSPORT ALLOWANCE AND HOUSE RENT ALLOWANCE ARE BEING TAKEN TO PARLIAMENT
CONFEDERATION SEEKS THE SUPPORT OF COMRADE BASUDEV ACHARYA M.P TO OPPOSE THE RESOLUTIONS
CONFEDERATION LETTER TO COMRADE BASUDEV ACHARYA IS PLACED HEREUNDER
CONFEDERATION OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES AND WORKERS
website: confederationhq.blogspot. com.
e mail: email@example.com
Conf/ 14/2012 Dated: 29th November, 2012-11-29
Kindly refer to the Lok Sabha Bulletin Part II Nos. 4687-4695 Wednesday, November, 21 2012 and the discussion your office had with us in the matter The Government has proposed to move two resolutions i.e. No. 4693 and 4694. As desired by you we send herewith the draft of the counter resolution to be moved by you in the matter.
Against Resolution No. 4693: Text of the Counter resolution.
From whom received. Ministry concerened.
Shri Basudeb Acharya. Finance. This house disapproves the proposal of the Government to reject the award given on 24th November, 2005 by the Board of Arbitration in CA Reference case No. 3 of 2004 regarding revision of rates of transport allowance to the Central Government employees as the expenditure to be incurred is not going to be Rs. 1232 crores. The increased allowance is to be given for only two months i.e. November, 2005 and December, 2005 as Transport allowance at much higher rates has already been paid from 1.1.2006 onwards.
Against Resolution No. 4694. Text of the Counter resolution.
Shri Basudeb Acharya. Finance This house disapproves the proposal of the Government to reject the award given on 6.4.2004 by the Board of Arbitration in CA reference case No. 2 of 2002 regarding grant of house rent allowance to the Central Government employees for the period from 1.1.2996 to 31.7.1997 at pre revised rates but with reference to revised pay. This is only a one time expenditure for the period of 19 months and logically to be related to the revised pay as was obtaining at the relevant point of time. Since this expenditure will be met from the savings in the Budget under the head Salaries no diversion of any funds are to take place.
HON'BLE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FROM ODISHA STATE INTERVENED FOR OUR STRIKE CHARTER
CONFEDERATION REQUESTED ALL STATE LEVEL LEADERS TO MEET THE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT AT ALL LEVELS TO SEEK THEIR INTERVENTION IN OUR STRIKE ISSUE
ODISHA COMRADES HAVE SUCCESSFULLY ATTENDED TO THIS TASK AND TWO HONOURABLE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FROM ODISHA HAVE WRITTEN TO HONOURABLE PRIME MINISTER ON OUR BEHALF
TAKE COPIES OF THESE LETTERS OF MPs AND QUICKLY MEET YOUR RESPECTIVE CONSTITUENCY PARLIAMENT MEMBERS FOR SIMILAR INTERVENTION AND SUPPORT
PROVISIONS RELATING TO PROFORMA PROMOTION
No. 6/5/2012-Estt (Pay-II)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions
Department of Personnel and Training
30th Nov., 2012
Subject: Provisions relating to proforma promotion.
Undersigned is directed to refer to this Department's OM No. 6/8/2009-Estt (Pay-II) dated the 17th June, 2010 regarding consolidated instructions on deputations. References are being received from Ministries/Departments seeking clarifications/relaxations in respect of provisions which pertain to proforma promotion in these orders or otherwise. The issues have been considered in consultation with the Department of Expenditure, and it has been decided to provide as under:
(i) Proforma promotion in the case of candidates promoted on passing a Limited Departmental Examination
The candidates passing the Limited Departmental Examination may be
allowed proforma promotion as under: In the case of candidates who have passed the LDCE and their names have been recommended for promotion, proforma promotions may be allowed from the date their juniors in the cadre in the order of merit in the LDCE have been so promoted. This may also be allowed in case there is no junior on account of such candidate being the last in the order of ranks/merit from the date he would have received such promotion if he had been in his cadre. Provided it will be ensured that the conditions laid down in the Department of Personnel OM No.8/4/84-Estt-(Pay-I) dated the 15 th July, 1985 are strictly fulfilled and the principle of NBR based on overall seniority list of cadres is followed.
(ii) Extension after the employee receives a proforma promotion: The para 8.6 of the OM No. 6/8/2009-Estt (Pay-II) dated the 17 th June, 2010 relating to regulation of pay after an officer has got proforma promotion and extension of deputation thereafter, which reads as under:
"If the Grade pay of the officer in the parent cadre becomes higher than that of the deputation post after getting proforma promotion, he may be allowed the pay in the pay band + Grade Pay of the post to which he is promoted till the time he completes the normal/ extended period of deputation (if he gets proforma promotion in the extended period) already sanctioned, if he so opts. No extension in the period of deputation shall be allowed to him after completing the sanctioned period of deputation."
is modified as follows:
8.6 (a)If the Grade pay of the officer in the parent cadre becomes higher than that of the deputation post after getting proforma promotion, he may be allowed the pay in the pay band + Grade Pay of the post to which he is promoted, if he so opts. In such cases, extensions in deputation after an employee has received the proforma promotion may be considered as per the instructions contained in paras 8.1 to 8.3.2.
(Vibha G. Mishra)